While I believe that it would handle most trail obstacles just fine, there are other trail shoes that are designed specifically for such challenging running. Combined with the Meta-rocker provided, I laced up the shoe well and was striking correctly in the middle of my foot instead of my heel. These shoes feel like I'm cheating. With over 200 miles on them these shoes are holding up really well. The well-built heel hugged my foot, providing more support on varied trail terrains as well.
Sam, Editor Thanks for reading Road Trail Run! This is a shoe that will please most people, but is not for everyone. The upper is still made of a two-layer mesh, for a combination of breathability and debris-resistance, and overlays still wrap around the midfoot. Personally, this is exactly the underfoot feel I like for everyday trail running, particularly during high-volume phases when I need to baby my feet. The fabric is strikingly inelastic, and such materials are typically unforgiving -- too tight in some places; too loose in others; prone to developing undesirable creases. It is responsive and not overly-bulky yet provides the needed arch support. I wore the 3 as a casual shoe because even though they were somewhat uncomfortable to run in, they were really sweet-looking shoes.
What did I uncover after putting the shoe through its usual paces? Glad you are enjoying them. Its weight is now 9. Similar shoes to compare with? Some rigidity has been extracted from the upper: the U-bar i. The ravennas don't feel as save as i want them to, especially when the trails are wet. Dom: Ironically, I purchased a pair of the based on , and found them deeply flawed. Shopping through links on articles help support RoadTrail Run and is much appreciated! For the record, I did not test it on highly technical terrain.
My only issues were heel slippage and the resulting rear foot instability, and at times slight irritation on the outside top of the toebox, similar spot that the Mafate irritated me though not to the degree that shoe did. The rubber compound also seems to be of a harder durometer, likely increasing durability and longevity, however I have found that tracton on rock and particularly in wet conditions suffers somewhat. The uniquely designed midsole transforms downhill running and acts as a buffer against jagged obstacles on the trail. Both times, I came away disappointed. But no -- there is no such reinforcement, and the striping is purely cosmetic. The perforated mesh lays nicely across the top of the shoe, creating some decent breathability for me here in SoCal and molds the foot well, while also allowing a good amount of width and splay for those longer runs on the trails. Lugs not so grippy but not planning on moving at speed on technical surfaces.
Both are excellent lightweight, race-able shoes, so choose according to your taste. The running shoe also features an internal heel counter. Hoka One One understood from the beginning that natural foot motion was extremely important for uniformity of stride. It is designed to give added toe protection against sharp trail elements. It also offers durability to the upper unit. It has a roomy toe box which accommodates the spreading of the toes during the liftoff phase of the gait cycle.
Tucked in behind the mesh are midfoot overlays that are useful in keeping the foot secure. Fast and light on the trail, its midsole geometry ensures a smooth ride on the road. Because of this, I never truly adapt to any one shoe over time, for better or worse I guess. I want to return them yet I keep running in them thinking maybe its my socks. Maybe a shoe which i can also use on snowy roads? What was refreshing about this shoe was its near-perfect simplicity. Another use for the shoes could be trail hiking.
Arranged closer together towards the heel for a smoother, more consistent ride, the lugs have a wider spread in the forefoot to help with grip on the trail and in wet conditions. On a side note, I also really enjoy using the pull tab on the back for putting on shoes. This is a built for the trail All Terrain with average cushion level for Hoka. Gripping pods pockmark the surface of the outer sole. There was an upper with minimal decoration and overlays, a thick slice of midsole, and modest patches of outsole to provide grip and durability. While the distinctive multi-lugged outsole leaves you in no doubt as to its trail heritage.
This curved disposition allows it to transition through the gait cycle with sureness and ease. It also makes sure to facilitate a smooth and confident transition from the heel to the toe. It seems as though Hoka has listened and added a noticeable amount of volume, somewhat to the midfoot and mainly to the forefoot. So far; much lighter than Stinson, stable and comfy. Arranged closer together towards the heel for a smoother, more consistent ride, the lugs have a wider spread in the forefoot to help with grip on the trail and in wet conditions. The result was light and soft and wonderful.
So far I am optimistic that these will hold up much better over time. A lot of my home trails are a mix of gravel, dirt and road. Don't stop making this shoe. Was this review helpful to you? This only seemed to be a serious concern for those who run steep and rocky trails, given the rough surfaces and shear forces associated with running fast on such terrain. A few updates have been made to the new version to give runners smoother and more consistent ride.